<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Camera Megapixels &#187; olympus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/tag/olympus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com</link>
	<description>Everything You Should Know Before Buying Digital Camera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:12:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Olympus E-620 SLR-Digital Camera 12 Megapixels</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-620-slr-digital-camera-12-megapixels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-620-slr-digital-camera-12-megapixels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-620-slr-digital-camera-12-megapixels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got the change from the small-format camera in the DSLR league behind me and we will present the Olympus E-620 purchased with Double Zoom Kit. I decline to technical information here deliberately, since these are all already described.
As a newcomer, I am totally thrilled by the camera.
Even without a manual to get adjusted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got the change from the small-format camera in the DSLR league behind me and we will present the Olympus E-620 purchased with Double Zoom Kit. I decline to technical information here deliberately, since these are all already described.<br />
As a newcomer, I am totally thrilled by the camera.<br />
Even without a manual to get adjusted quickly to the basic functions. The subject programs facilitate the handling, good results can be reached quickly. Alternatively, of course, savvy users all the options in manual is available.<br />
The whole thing fits into a truly compact body &#8211; a key reason to buy for me because I do not rumschleppen pounds of equipment with me wants. I use to transport the Slingshot 100 AW from Lowepro and thus quickly reach the camera without having to settle permanently the backpack. The camera fits comfortably in your hand, the lenses make a quality impression and the results have been convincing me very much. The camera is quick to deploy, thanks to the swivel monitor, you can create exceptional photos and views from the Future.<br />
The only negative point so far is the included software (Olympus Master / Studio 2), although sufficient for basic tasks, but of course, is no substitute for a good image editing program.</p>
<p>I would recommend Olympus E-620 at any time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-620-slr-digital-camera-12-megapixels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus PEN E-P1 SLR-Digital Camera Megapixels</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-pen-e-p1-slr-digital-camera-megapixels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-pen-e-p1-slr-digital-camera-megapixels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera megapixels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-pen-e-p1-slr-digital-camera-megapixels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the beginning there was the euphoria. Finally, a handy, lightweight camera that I need to ski, mountain bike and was able to accompany tours without compromising on image quality to make. After recharging the battery and the usual settings (it lasted because of the tremendous volume of options) for longer than I thought I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning there was the euphoria. Finally, a handy, lightweight camera that I need to ski, mountain bike and was able to accompany tours without compromising on image quality to make. After recharging the battery and the usual settings (it lasted because of the tremendous volume of options) for longer than I thought I wanted to swing down on the wheel and firing a first series of photos. That led to the first problem: the lack of a suitable camera bag, which ensures a rapid operational readiness and protects. Olympus has made it no thought. (The &#8220;stylish Taschenbody CS-10B-on the safe transport&#8221; of anything except protecting the camera&#8217;s bottom can only be described as fashion gag.) So first of all pure in the secured against commuting his breast pocket, where else is accommodated my Nikon D40. After further tours and a holiday to the following conclusion: </p>
<p>1. Construction, Operation: Olympus PEN E-P1 makes a very solid, trivalent impression, even if the metal housing is only simulated. The main features are about something small buttons (on the back too poorly visible or less) satisfactory access. Disappointingly, only the On / Off button. The leaves when the sun is almost non-visible light once again the question remains open after the state seized the device is switched on but then a gentle press on the multi-selector and one&#8217;s wrong with ISO, timer ect. to pretend. Better to switch off these options in the area and change the camera settings on the Ribbon Menu clear. That is quite clearly visible in sunlight, because the only low-resolution screen is better than its reputation and the desire for electronic and optical viewfinder can not arise in the first. </p>
<p>2. Admission unfold: Lens, wait for power on, sensor cleaning, wait until the auto focus goes from near to infinity and back to the proper distance throwing. Anyone who has gone through this routine a few times, which is clear that it is in Olympus PEN E-P1 is not a snapshot camera, but requires patience. Of course you can do with some luck Vorfokussieren and sports photography, but for sure there is better equipment. When manually setting the magnifying glass feature is helpful, but what in the strong sun and not much help. Getting used to the distance setting by wire, especially as the smooth adjustment ring has no distance markings. Neither the Kitobjektiv, nor for the 17mm lens sun visors are available, which leads to increased light scattering (compare Nikon) in the pictures. </p>
<p>3. Image quality: On the there is not much to find fault. The lens is a good average, the image parameters can be adjusted in a manner that is usually reserved for professional cameras. If the pictures seem to 6400 ISO under certain circumstances, be acceptable, this is a sign that the Image Stabilizer-equipped with an internal camera for indoor and Schwachlichtsituationen is well endowed. </p>
<p>Conclusion: The Olympus E-P1 is a solid, handy camera, which relates what the image quality-even with the Kitobjektiv brings excellent results. Outdoor fans are not quite on their behalf, the camera is not weatherproof and not just quick to use, moreover, still lacks a sound-ready case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-pen-e-p1-slr-digital-camera-megapixels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus E-30 SLR-Digital Camera 12 Megapixel</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-30-slr-digital-camera-12-megapixel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-30-slr-digital-camera-12-megapixel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-30-slr-digital-camera-12-megapixel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all: I am not counting on each component, since these are already described above.
Olympus E-30 is a very good camera for amateur photographers, but also for semi-professionals.
You can use the camera between the E-3 and the e-lane 520, although they strongly tend towards E-3.
Olympus E-30 has 12.3 MP but still offers a good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all: I am not counting on each component, since these are already described above.<br />
Olympus E-30 is a very good camera for amateur photographers, but also for semi-professionals.<br />
You can use the camera between the E-3 and the e-lane 520, although they strongly tend towards E-3.<br />
Olympus E-30 has 12.3 MP but still offers a good noise performance. It is even a bit sharper than the E-3. But in laboratory tests, the camera tends to be slightly red-stitch. In practice, I could not not figure it.<br />
The biggest difference to the E-3 is that the E-30 is not completely waterproof and has no magnesium core. Nevertheless, the E-30 spritwassergesch?tzt.<br />
The E-30 has many things inherited from its big brother the E-3. For example, the &#8220;fastest Autofokua the world&#8221; with 11 AF points and the swiveling display.<br />
Of course, here are the type filters are even mentioned. I think that they are &#8220;only&#8221; a small gimmick. However, you can really have fun with them. The advantage which is that you can see the effect already in the LifeView mode and erparen one hand, the effect of filtering processing on the PC.<br />
What little &#8220;gimmick&#8221; is I really like the leveling. Olympus has verabaut in the body of an electronic spirit level, the tendency in the x and y display area. At first I was very skeptical, but once tried changed the skepticism into enthusiasm. The scale is in any display (Olympus E-30 has a total of three, when the viewfinder with this one: display, viewfinder display and LC-display) and is really accurate. Since I am a notorious crooked camera-holder seems to me to this function very good.<br />
I know that this does not even describe most of the functions, but refinements can be seen in a variety of tests on the internet.<br />
-> Conclusion: The price is quite abundant, but you&#8217;ll get a very good camera. It is user-formed rooms and offers good picture quality. For absolute beginners this camera is not suitable. Although Switzerland has a fully automatic program, but the full functionality is not utilized it. As a newcomer, you should prefer to e-4xxx access or e-5xxx series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-30-slr-digital-camera-12-megapixel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gf1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gf1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic lumix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gf1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first SLR was a &#8220;Pentax ME super&#8221; (1980), my first good digital camera &#8220;Canon G10&#8243; (2008) and my first digital SLR, the &#8220;Pentax K20D&#8221; (2009). Now I am satisfied and proud owner of the &#8220;Lumix GF1&#8243; (2009). Caveat: the camera is so good that it is addictive. And not just because it is so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first SLR was a &#8220;Pentax ME super&#8221; (1980), my first good digital camera &#8220;Canon G10&#8243; (2008) and my first digital SLR, the &#8220;Pentax K20D&#8221; (2009). Now I am satisfied and proud owner of the &#8220;Lumix GF1&#8243; (2009). Caveat: the camera is so good that it is addictive. And not just because it is so small () matches with the 14-45mm zoom into the pocket. But she is not exactly a bargain <img src='http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>We know that the sensor size of the &#8220;displacement&#8221; of a camera. Where a lot of power under the hood, there are plenty in reserve. The Canon G10 &#8220;had already impressed me, however, the tiny sensor size of a compact camera of course has its limits in terms of light sensitivity, noise performance and depth. At ISO 200) should be slowly closing in the &#8220;Canon G10 &#8216;(ISO 400 at the&#8221; G11 &#8220;&#8230; </p>
<p>The sensor of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 is 5 times greater than that of the&#8221; Canon G10/G11 and slightly smaller than that of the DSLR &#8216;K20D Pentax (APS-C). As expected, one can make quite relaxed up to ISO 800 virtually noise-free pictures, only from ISO 1600, image noise (so that one begins to notice it). And depth is also not a problem, such as portraits with blurred background are, of course (with an open aperture, of course, is best). The SLR is feeling! </p>
<p>The speed of the autofocus is very good as opposed to &#8220;Olympus Pen&#8221;, which indeed is also available in the MFT (Micro Four Thirds) sector. Measured by the shutter lag is about 0.4 seconds including autofocus without AF even only 0.05 seconds (insanely fast) even for DSLR conditions. With three frames per second, it is as fast as the &#8220;Pentax K20D, but quietly charming. In the midst of a crowd, it all falls on not if you flash a picture series &#8220;fires&#8221;. </p>
<p>The picture quality is simply stunning: super-sharp, natural colors with rather less saturation, virtually no image noise until ISO 800 Demo images on richy Schley de. The guide number of 6 rather puny-sized pop-up flash goes through as a fill-in any event and makes absolutely no red eyes. Assembled &#8220;to correct&#8221; flashes on the hot shoe (for example, Metz, LZ 48) and work via the TTL (through the lens), together with the best GF1. The viewfinder (which I have not) might be of interest in strong sunlight, although the brilliant 3-inch display permits (460,000 pixels) very good image control. In manual focus the camera automatically switches to the lens, so you can see the finest details. </p>
<p>The operation is intuitive and easy OPERATIONS WERE CARRIED (unlike the maze-down menu of &#8220;Olympus PEN&#8221;). Beginners can turn on the &#8220;iA&#8221; mode and all settings (including ISO, leaving Weissabglich) the camera&#8217;s computer. With the uppermost rotary switch to switch to continuous shooting, exposure bracketing, and self-timer. With the &#8220;ISO button to quickly switch between different sensitivities to and fro. The Quick menu you can quickly select JPG, RAW or RAW + JPG and more. </p>
<p>For the manipulation of images in RAW format, the extensive and send software &#8220;SILKYPIX Developer SE&#8221; is available. It optimizes the picture, either automatically or manually. The results are convincing. </p>
<p>And then the HD videos! Simply great. On Youtube you will find so many demos &#8230; The mono microphone reminds you that you have a camera in hand and no camcorder. But the quality is also in full screen (1440 x 900 with me one way) to kneel down. You can zoom during filming, and either manually or via auto focus (works great!). For editing and cutting, I suppose, &#8220;Pinnacle Studio HD. </p>
<p>A special feature is the interchangeable lenses. You can use not only the MFT lenses from Olympus and Panasonic, but with adapters for many camera models and old treasures, even Zeiss lenses. So you can make on a camera market is a bargain and that Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 mount (of course) without autofocus and image stabilizer. The built-in kit zoom lens image stabilization allows for sharp handheld photos even at 1 / 5 seconds, not only at 28mm wide angle, but also in 90mm telephoto. </p>
<p>Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 (makes me at least) addictive because they&#8217;re so small, is so quiet and so powerful. An SLR camera in the format! For people who have the money remains absolutely recommended and a guarantor of happiness for demanding photographers who appreciate the compact size of a &#8220;Canon G10&#8243; with the picture quality of an SLR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gf1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus E-420 SLR-Digital Camera 10 Megapixels</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-420-slr-digital-camera-10-megapixels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-420-slr-digital-camera-10-megapixels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 megapixels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-420-slr-digital-camera-10-megapixels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the Olympus E-420 including the lens 14-42mm, 40-150mm and 25mm. 
Final decision to buy for me were:
-The compact dimensions of the camera AND the lenses and the light weight
-the relatively low price
The high-quality appearance (design &#038; processing) 
Having now been using the camera a few weeks, I can allow myself slowly a verdict. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the Olympus E-420 including the lens 14-42mm, 40-150mm and 25mm. </p>
<p>Final decision to buy for me were:<br />
-The compact dimensions of the camera AND the lenses and the light weight<br />
-the relatively low price<br />
The high-quality appearance (design &#038; processing) </p>
<p>Having now been using the camera a few weeks, I can allow myself slowly a verdict. The other reviewers have already written about many things and much that is true, this camera and the image quality. I would like to add a few points. It is solely to criticism, but you should not misinterpret this: I think the camera is good in spite of everything! </p>
<p>Portraits<br />
Consider yourself why they need the camera. Not to be discussed here due to physical factors make it for Basic, like me, and maybe you, too, with this camera and the &#8220;conventional lenses (see above) rather difficult to make portraits in such a way that the background nicely blurred, while the person is hot is) (known as bokeh. That can buy cameras from other manufacturers with a larger sensor would be better or you would have a more appropriate basis of additional Olympus lenses (eg 50mm) </p>
<p>Low-light situations<br />
The kit lenses are good, but for low-light situations not recommend unreservedly. A (not existing) image stabilizer would improve the results. Also consider in this context that the camera flash in dark environments, the focus prior to shooting to be able to use (instead of a red light relief) as with other manufacturers. That can be really annoying. </p>
<p>Live View<br />
The Live View function sounds impressive, but despite everything, not nearly as practicable as in a compact camera, since the mirror is folded prior to the initiation anscheind always first. As a result, it has one, in my opinion, quite long and unacceptable &#8220;shutter lag&#8221;. I now once again use the viewfinder. </p>
<p>Which kit should you take?<br />
The 25mm pancake lens gives the camera a relatively compact DSLR combination. However, you have the pancake with no zoom and the view is not well suited for every situation. The picture quality of this lens is also my opinion not better than the 14-42mm zoom. And for the price but the 25mm pancake you already have a compact camera. You can actually put in your pocket, what with the 420, despite their &#8220;relative&#8221; compactness, unfortunately, does not go so well.<br />
I personally find the double zoom kit most appropriate. The information contained lenses are good and very light and compact.<br />
To whom is less important to the weight, you can buy the camera separately and to the excellent 14-54mm or 12-60mm. Over the 17-45mm, I can not say anything, I do not know.<br />
Side note: The cheaper lenses work in manual mode all the way, not mechanically but &#8220;by wire&#8221;. I.e. when the camera is off, can not be offline in order to advance herumzoomen different compositions tested. </p>
<p>The Seeker<br />
The viewfinder is smaller than in many other DSLR cameras. How big is this disadvantage, everyone must decide for themselves. But there is a &#8220;viewfinder&#8221; that can be infected, instead of the eye cup, which enlarges the viewfinder image by a factor of 1.2. </p>
<p>The worst picture is the way to what was not even fired. Finally, I would therefore like to emphasize that the camera invites me because of their ease of use and outstanding processing constantly attracts and / or photographs to play with. What can be said on a commendable camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-420-slr-digital-camera-10-megapixels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus E-520 SLR-Digital Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-520-slr-digital-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-520-slr-digital-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-520-slr-digital-camera/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since a few days, I now have the Olympus E-520, here in the double zoom kit with the 14-42mm and 40-150mm.
As I have already gained experience with the E-510, I was curious to see what&#8217;s new, what is different at the 520th
Outwardly, the Olympus E-520 has remained nearly constant, there are really only one way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since a few days, I now have the Olympus E-520, here in the double zoom kit with the 14-42mm and 40-150mm.<br />
As I have already gained experience with the E-510, I was curious to see what&#8217;s new, what is different at the 520th<br />
Outwardly, the Olympus E-520 has remained nearly constant, there are really only one way here? Model of care?. Quite small and very easy it is something for all those who do not want to tow with great weight. The two kit lenses fit perfectly here, they are also very easy.<br />
The outward impression of the camera is very good, almost anything better than the 510! Looks valent. Everything is well in hand, all the controls are intuitive and logically arranged to achieve.<br />
The E-520 has the frequently judged as excellent protection against dust. From my own experience I know that this dust really works. A decision criterion, in my opinion.<br />
An outstanding feature is the? Bobblehead?, Called? Image stabilizer? ? the Verwackelschutz. In contrast to cameras from other brands, he is built into the body of the camera, so do not need to be purchased with any lens.<br />
Of course, I once made with the 40-150 test and could still make for fairly long exposure times, sharp images. The thing works great! With exposure times of e.g. 1 / 30 razor-sharp images at 150mm succeed! Comparisons with IS turned off (so the acronym ImageStabilizers) make the difference clear. There are in the E-520 three settings for the IS, the &#8220;standard setting&#8221; IS1 that works in all the &#8220;loose directions,&#8221; the setting IS2, which is effective in horizontal landscape mode to go with only images in the vertical direction, and IS3, the as IS2, but works in portrait mode. At IS1 would go along with the normal IS1 try to compensate for the Mitziehbewegung. </p>
<p>In the Olympus E-520, there is a live-view, so you can, as usual with compact cameras to see through the display, which wants to take. The delay on the trigger should not be underestimated, however. Runterschwenken The mirror must be first, then the AF measures the distance, then works back up the mirror and the image is made. Nothing for snapshots.<br />
While here recently are the so-called contrast measurement, which can also measure the distance and when folded mirror is slightly faster.<br />
Especially for macro photography on a tripod Live View is great! Above all, because you can see on the 10x zoom of the preview image and focus very precisely, whether the image is sharp. For macro photographers a real HighLight!<br />
The E-520 can also be seen faces! Yes, no nonsense, this works! I first thought of a joke, but nothing there! However, only works in Live View, right.<br />
If the face is turned on, you can see on the screen a small rectangle around the face, which has been detected. Works well with two faces, two rectangles. Whether this is also linked to three or four, I have not been tested yet. In any case, the exposure will be something on the detected faces? Concentrated?. Lying face e.g. in the dark, then lit a bit longer. Actually worked quite well, even though this feature at first something? yes? happened to sound funny.<br />
The E-520 has improved with a different processor. She also now has a shadow brightening, with the very dark areas, which threaten to drown, to be raised somewhat. Very nice for those who do not want to bother with RAW and complicate subsequent processing on the computer. </p>
<p>The enclosed 40-150 before I could inspect times. In my opinion, an absolute highlight in the segment! Easy and cheap, but knackscharf in the picture! No wonder in light intensity, but you can not have it all.<br />
The small zoom does his job well. Very small and light, very tidy imaging properties. </p>
<p>Finally, I can only say that the Olympus E-520 is really fun! Small and lightweight, with excellent details (ImageStabilizer, live-view) and very good image quality. For those who have an entry into the SLR world looking for a real tip, just with those two lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalcameramegapixels.com/reviews/olympus-e-520-slr-digital-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
