Canon EOS 10D

reviews

Digital photography is still not quite as far as the analogue photography, and there are a number of reasons. One of them is certainly in the changed focal length, which leads to Canon EOS 10D to the fact that although over 60 EF lenses from the analog world fit mechanically, as is the powerful TTL flash units, but that this show digitally very different properties that Flashes partially not E-TTL capable, and that you are changing from an analog system, despite all his experience with equipment starts again at zero. But, and this is the other, positive side, as close as the EOS 10D now comes barely a device up to analogue photography, especially at this price. But if you want to actually have a true digital wide-angle photography, should be clear about the fact that the price for the housing and investment in a high-aperture ultra-wide angle lens like the Canon 15-35 (almost 2,000 euros) or the newly published 12-35 EX heard from Sigma (around 900 euros). Everything else is window dressing, who waived it, you can also just put up with a much cheaper digital bridge camera from the upper power take (eg Fuji FinePix S7000). But from the beginning.

Unlike most digital cameras Bridge (Bridge because they are almost as powerful as real SLR and therefore represent a bridge solution), Canon EOS 10D provides unmistakable differences. It starts with the rugged metal housing, which is excellent in the hand and hold itself because of its weight can be very quiet. Therefore, it is also quite heavy and very e.g. in the mountains just what kind of people with condition. Anyone, however, never could get used to the delayed release of digital cameras, will note with satisfaction that the EOS 10D is almost as fast as analog cameras – even if they show in the ambitious sports and action photography still clear limits. Because the objective is to move to the interior of the enclosure shall be protected especially against gathering dust – far more attention than in darkrooms needed so that nothing would settle on the sensitive CCD. By the way: who is rarely off-road, which is also with the much cheaper EOS 300D will be happy – the 10D is especially for photographers who want to take in terms of robustness and functionality, no compromise.
For a time there was fierce debate among experts, because some of the delivered 10D had difficulty with the proper focusing and with the autofocus. Canon established the lapidary was with “greater tolerance ranges for digital focus.” In this context, reports of trouble focusing in collaboration with some strange or even with Canon lenses. Where the error still occurs (more than half the photos taken is then blurred or wrongly focused), offers Canon recalibration consuming the entire camera including the lens at the plant. Was with me but not necessary. However, it is useful to keep from time to time to lookout for firmware updates, two are now, to bring tangible improvements, such as an optimized co-operation while saving on Microdrive hard drives.

Conclusion for the time being, Canon EOS 10D is, it provides them so you can dasss ausreizen fact their performance is still an expensive joke. The results of at least half depends on the quality of the lenses, and doubled the purchase smooth doubled. Also provides flash coverage is essential, and several batteries to change or the optional battery grip. Whether it’s worth, everyone must decide for themselves, because in a year or two SLR cameras will certainly still much more powerful – and until then is there more lenses that are already tailored to specific features of digital photography. Speed and efficiency interpolated especially in tricky lighting conditions (ISO1.600, up to 3,200!) And the clear operation of the EOS 10D to the serious amateur as well as open to be desired. When a professional should look like slightly different. But more people need to judge the merit of photography really their money.

Tags: , ,

Leave a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>